I should probably be doing homework right now, but the
Steelers are on and I am thoroughly engrossed with a new book I just picked up.
"Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts
Congress -- and a Plan to Stop It," by Lawrence Lessig has to be one of
the best works of political criticism I have read in a while. From what I have gathered so far, the author shows no
sign of bias and is completely objective, or as objective as one can be, with his argument. Moreover, he cites ideas stemming from
Libertarian, Conservative, and Liberal ideologies. I am pretty sure this only works because the issue
at hand is grand and impacts all sides of the political spectrum. Still, I finally feel there is someone out
there with a sound head on his shoulders.
But this isn't just about the book; it's about something the
author touches on, something that I personally have strong convictions
for. This has to do with our obesity
epidemic and its correlation to the government subsidies that perpetually
exacerbate the woes our country finds itself in today. Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) is one of the
country's biggest agricultural companies. It is a conglomerate of organizations
that handles the production and supply of foods such as grain, rice, corn, and
other products. In 2009, their total
revenues exceeded $69 billion. According to a Cato Institute study by James
Bovard called, "Archer Daniels Midland: A Case Study in Corporate
Welfare," at least 43 percent of those profits are from products
"heavily subsidized or protected by the American Government." What does this mean? Well it means thanks to tariffs imposed by
our government to protect American production of certain goods that on top of
it, are subsidized by us, the tax payers, ADM is able to produce foods
such as high fructose corn syrup at low costs.
Have you ever wondered why you see a link between obesity
and individuals in low socioeconomic classes?
That's because our government assists in the production of cheap foods
that are extremely pernicious to our health.
Now anything in moderation is fine, in my personal opinion, but here we
have a nation that consumes prodigious amounts of foods thanks to the economic
distortions committed by our government.
Moreover, not only does the cheap production of corn allow for an
abundance of soda pop, chips, and gum drops, but it also increases the ability
to feed more cattle on large industrialized farms. So while government subsidies kill off the
smaller farms, we also continue to feed cows more corn. Cows evolved to ingest grass, not corn, and
while they try to digest it, they also become victims of bacteria brewing
inside their stomachs. But don't worry,
we can just fix this by increasing the amount of antibiotics we feed our cattle.
Wait a second, isn't there reason why doctors don't
prescribe antibiotics to us every single time we have a cough or a cold? Yes,
there is, and that is because the more antibiotics we take, the more we
encourage the development of drug resistant diseases. Did you ever wonder why e-coli is such a big
problem if all of these animals are taking antibiotics?
Not only do we have a market that allows individuals to
consume price distorted, unhealthy products, but we are also more at risk for
disease. You may think that I am just
some health nut who wants everyone to be healthy. Well, you're
right, I am. But there is more to it. What happens when we have the
health issues we do, especially the ones that are encouraged by the recent
obesity "epidemic?" They
impact the health care system, and thus increase the cost of it.
So while everyone sits here moaning about health care, maybe
we should take some preemptive steps to mitigate our dependency on the drugs
and doctors. Maybe we should encourage
policy that eradicates this corporate welfare, policy that will allow foods to
be produced at an actual market price, and give a fair chance to goods that are truly beneficial to our health.
For those of you who align with the Democrats or the
Republicans, I respect the fact that you choose to be politically active. But these subsidies are the result of both
parties being easily swayed by lobbyists on Capitol Hill. Now there is a difference between campaign contributions and straight bribery, but even without an obvious agreement of quid pro quo, it still occurs due to a gift based system of reciprocity. Think about it, a friend gets you something, and even though they say its no big deal, you are socially bonded to the norm that something must be given back in order to show gratitude. And that's what happens on Capitol Hill. Subconsciously or not, we remember favors.
Now I do not believe our government consists of a bunch of
evil people who reap the wealth while all of us get sick. That is ludicrous, and if you know anyone
that thinks that you should probably slap them. It is a simple as this, our
leaders are good people. They all, or at
least, most of them got involved because they cared, because they wanted to make
America a better place. But we have a
system that is corrupt, and no matter who enters that system, the corruption
will take over. It's similar to how many
of us become dependent on family at times of need. It’s all a matter of how
things are structured, and where the power lays.
I believe in our government and I believe in this countries
foundation and ideals. We have potential
to become a nation full of brilliant, hardworking individuals that follow the cause of our
founding fathers. We have enough wealth
to make this world, our world, a better place.
But before we go off and try fixing problems that you can't fix with
guns and bombs, let’s take care of the issues we face at home first. Only then can we be true leaders within this
global civilization.
Okay, that's it, that's my rant.
Enjoy your Week,
Best wishes,
Mark